Based on this document from the Community Association of Community Legal Centres in Australia, it becomes clearer, perhaps, why men down under are keeping their pants on.
But let's be open-minded; based on the statistics in the report, and assuming that they aren't junk science, why is the Australian government allowing any man in that country to donate sperm or even to have children? So many violent, uncaring men.... why allow those genes into the pool at all? And based on this report, that should apply even more to aboriginal men in Australia - what savages!
"Community Association of Community Legal Centres" Wouldn't it have been easier and more accurate to call themselves "Gender Feminists Are Us Legal Centres"?
Quote from Manumit:
The document is short (8 pages) and essentially a position/policy paper arguing a feminist line seeking to protect sole mother custody and against greater paternal involvement and parenting (involving residency of the child with the father), rather than a truly informative paper about shared parenting.
A number of the paper's sources are from the 'typical suspects' favoured and trusted by Alastair Nicholson (former chief judge of the Family Court of Australia [FCA]) to produce feminist and anti-father results and reports (eg. Rhoades, Kaye).
One of the authoresses was Joanna Fletcher, a lesbian lawyer with Women's Legal Services Australia (and previously the Victorian* Women's Legal Service Centre). One of her claims to fame has been to misuse Victorian taxpayers' money to work against fair compensation for paternity fraud victim Liam Magill (by working for this ex-wife Meredith McClelland). On 8 December 2005 Fletcher released a one page statement, on behalf of the Women's Legal Services Australia, entitled "Assessing Changes to the Family Law System".
No comments:
Post a Comment